De Ruiter, Laura and Theakston, Anna and Lieven, Elena and Brandt, Silke
(2021).
International Centre for Language and Communicative Development: The Effect of Information Structure on the Acquisition of Complex Sentences, 2014-2020.
[Data Collection]. Colchester, Essex:
UK Data Service.
10.5255/UKDA-SN-853899
The International Centre for Language and Communicative Development (LuCiD) will bring about a transformation in our understanding of how children learn to communicate, and deliver the crucial information needed to design effective interventions in child healthcare, communicative development and early years education.
Learning to use language to communicate is hugely important for society. Failure to develop language and communication skills at the right age is a major predictor of educational and social inequality in later life. To tackle this problem, we need to know the answers to a number of questions: How do children learn language from what they see and hear? What do measures of children's brain activity tell us about what they know? and How do differences between children and differences in their environments affect how children learn to talk? Answering these questions is a major challenge for researchers. LuCiD will bring together researchers from a wide range of different backgrounds to address this challenge.
The LuCiD Centre will be based in the North West of England and will coordinate five streams of research in the UK and abroad. It will use multiple methods to address central issues, create new technology products, and communicate evidence-based information directly to other researchers and to parents, practitioners and policy-makers.
LuCiD's RESEARCH AGENDA will address four key questions in language and communicative development: 1) ENVIRONMENT: How do children combine the different kinds of information that they see and hear to learn language? 2) KNOWLEDGE: How do children learn the word meanings and grammatical categories of their language? 3) COMMUNICATION: How do children learn to use their language to communicate effectively? 4) VARIATION: How do children learn languages with different structures and in different cultural environments?
The fifth stream, the LANGUAGE 0-5 PROJECT, will connect the other four streams. It will follow 80 English learning children from 6 months to 5 years, studying how and why some children's language development is different from others. A key feature of this project is that the children will take part in studies within the other four streams. This will enable us to build a complete picture of language development from the very beginning through to school readiness.
Applying different methods to study children's language development will constrain the types of explanations that can be proposed, helping us create much more accurate theories of language development. We will observe and record children in natural interaction as well as studying their language in more controlled experiments, using behavioural measures and correlations with brain activity (EEG). Transcripts of children's language and interaction will be analysed and used to model how these two are related using powerful computer algorithms.
LuciD's TECHNOLOGY AGENDA will develop new multi-method approaches and create new technology products for researchers, healthcare and education professionals. We will build a 'big data' management and sharing system to make all our data freely available; create a toolkit of software (LANGUAGE RESEARCHER'S TOOLKIT) so that researchers can analyse speech more easily and more accurately; and develop a smartphone app (the BABYTALK APP) that will allow parents, researchers and practitioners to monitor, assess and promote children's language development.
With the help of six IMPACT CHAMPIONS, LuCiD's COMMUNICATIONS AGENDA will ensure that parents know how they can best help their children learn to talk, and give healthcare and education professionals and policy-makers the information they need to create intervention programmes that are firmly rooted in the latest research findings.
Data description (abstract)
Understanding complex sentences that contain multiple clauses referring to events in the world and the relations between them is an important development in children's language learning. A number of theoretical positions have suggested that factors like syntactic structure (clause order), iconicity (whether the order of clauses reflects the order of events), and givenness (whether information is shared between speakers) affect ease of comprehension. We tested these accounts by investigating how these factors interact in British English-speaking children's comprehension of complex sentences with adverbial clauses (after, before, because, if), while controlling for language level, working memory and inhibitory control. 92 children in three age groups (4, 5 and 8 years) and 17 adults completed a picture selection task. Participants heard an initial context sentence, followed by a two-clause sentence which varied in: (1) the order of the main and subordinate clause; (2) the order of given and new information; and (3) whether the given information occurred in the main or subordinate clause. Accuracy and response times were measured. Our results showed that given-before-new improves comprehension for four- and five-year-olds, but only when the given information is in the initial subordinate clause (e.g., “Sue crawls on the floor. Before she crawls on the floor, she hops up and down”). Temporal adverbials (after, before) were processed faster than causal adverbials (because, if). These effects were not found for the eight-year-olds, whose performance was more similar to that of the adults. Providing a context sentence also improved performance compared to presenting the test sentences in isolation. We conclude that existing accounts based on either ease of processing or information structure cannot fully account for these findings, and suggest a more integrated explanation which reflects children's developing language and literacy skills.
Manuscript available here:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104130
Pre-registration available here:
https://osf.io/7pw5j
Data and analysis script available here:
https://osf.io/p8kzm/
Data creators: |
|
Sponsors: |
Economic and Social Research Council
|
Grant reference: |
ES/L008955/1
|
Topic classification: |
Psychology
|
Keywords: |
LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT, COMPREHENSION, LINGUISTICS
|
Project title: |
The International Centre for Language and Communicative Development
|
Alternative title: |
LuCiD WP11
|
Grant holders: |
Elena Lieven, Bob McMurray, Jeffrey Elman, Gert Westermann, Morten H Christiansen, Thea Cameron-Faulkner, Fernand Gobet, Ludovica Serratrice, Sabine Stoll, Meredith Rowe, Padraic Monaghan, Michael Tomasello, Ben Ambridge, Silke Brandt, Anna Theakston, Eugenio Parise, Caroline Frances Rowland, Colin James Bannard, Grzegorz Krajewski, Franklin Chang, Floriana Grasso, Evan James Kidd, Julian Mark Pine, Arielle Borovsky, Vincent Michael Reid, Katherine Alcock, Daniel Freudenthal
|
Project dates: |
From | To |
---|
1 September 2014 | 31 May 2020 |
|
Date published: |
26 Aug 2021 16:49
|
Last modified: |
26 Aug 2021 16:50
|
Collection period: |
Date from: | Date to: |
---|
1 September 2014 | 31 May 2020 |
|
Country: |
England |
Data collection method: |
We tested 92 children and 17 adult controls. The children were recruited through nurseries and primary schools in the Manchester area (North-West of England), and at the Manchester Museum. Prior informed consent was obtained from caregivers/parents. All children were monolingual, native speakers of English without any known history of speech or language problems or developmental delays. Of the 92 child participants, 40 were between 3;6 to 4;5 years old (M = 48 months, SD = 3 months, 17 girls), 40 were between 4;6 and 5;5 years old (M = 60 months, SD = 2.8 months, 22 girls), and 12 were between 7;1 and 9;6 years old (M = 8;3, SD = 0;1, 7 girls). We will refer to the first group as the four-year-olds, the second group as the five-year-olds, and the third group as the eight-year-olds. Nine additional children were tested, but their data had to be excluded because they didn’t understand the task (five children), turned later out to be older than the targeted age range (three children), or because they did not want to continue after the warm-up (one child). In addition, one child chose not to do the second session, and one child did not do the digit-span (memory) task. For one child, the data for the dimensional change card sort (inhibition) were lost due to experimenter error. As mixed-effects models deal well with missing data, the data of these three participants were retained in the final data set. The adult participants (N = 17, M = 35 years, 13 women) were visitors to the Manchester Museum and students or staff members from the University of Manchester, and native speakers of English. One additional adult participant’s data were excluded because he was a non-native speaker of English. Due to a technical error, for two adult participants, the final trials were not recorded, resulting in the loss of two trials. Note that the initial study plan (see pre-registration) contained only four- and five-year-olds and adults. Because we later found that five-year-olds were far from adult-like, we tested an additional, smaller sample of eight-year-olds to get a more comprehensive picture of the developmental trend. For reasons of interpretation we present the eight-year-olds’ data together with the other data.
The four- and five-year-old children were tested in a quiet area in their nurseries and primary schools. In addition to the sentence comprehension test, the children completed six tasks on general language ability and vocabulary, working and short-term memory, and inhibitory control, which are detailed below. The tasks were spread over two sessions on two separate (and typically consecutive) days. Each session lasted between 25 and 40 min. Children completed half of all items of the sentence comprehension task in session one, and the other half in session two. In each session, the children also completed one inhibition task, one general language task, and one memory task. With the exception of the first inhibition task (Flanker task), children always first completed the sentence comprehension task before doing the other tasks (see Appendix 1 for details). The eight-year-olds and the adults were tested in the Study area at the Manchester Museum and at the Child Study Centre at the University of Manchester. They only did the sentence comprehension task and the digit span (memory) task. They completed all items in one session, with a short break between two blocks. The allocation of trials across sessions and the experimental lists are described in Experimental lists (Section 2.3.5) below. |
Observation unit: |
Individual |
Kind of data: |
Numeric, Text |
Type of data: |
Experimental data
|
Resource language: |
English |
|
Rights owners: |
|
Contact: |
|
Notes on access: |
The Data Collection is available from an external repository. Access is available via Related Resources.
|
Publisher: |
UK Data Service
|
Last modified: |
26 Aug 2021 16:50
|
|
Available Files
No Files to display
Data collections
Publications
Website
Edit item (login required)
|
Edit Item |