Bakke, Kristin Marie
(2019).
After the war ends: Violence in Post-Soviet unrecognized states.
[Data Collection]. Colchester, Essex:
UK Data Archive.
10.5255/UKDA-SN-851970
What happens after the fighting in intrastate conflicts officially ends? Peace settlements and military victories are assumed to bring an end to violence, yet they are often followed by high levels of crime and fighting among former enemies, even among former allies.
Questions about post-war violence are particularly important in so-called de facto states born out of violent struggles, as these are vulnerable entities in the international system from the very outset. De facto, or unrecognized, states lack international recognition but function as state-like entities in that they control the population within their territories. While de facto states have been features on the international scene for decades, the fall of the USSR and subsequent separatist conflicts gave rise to several such state-like entities - places like Abkhazia, Chechnya, Nagorno Karabkah, South Ossetia, and Transdniestria.
This study theorises and examines the causes and consequences of post-war violence within these de facto states. Based on statistical analyses of survey data, the study seeks to assess how the inhabitants’ experiences of criminal and political violence affect their views of the de facto states and their regimes. The study also aims to trace how the organisation and nature of war-time violence shapes post-war peace and stability (or lack thereof).
The survey conducted as part of this ESRC-funded project took place in Nagorno Karabakh in September 2013. For related research based on a similar survey carried out in another de facto state (funded by the National Science Foundation in the US), see Bakke, O’Loughlin, Toal, and Ward’s 2014 article in International Studies Quarterly on “Convincing State-Builders? Disaggregating Internal Legitimacy in Abkhazia". This is available via the related resources.
Data description (abstract)
The survey is part of the ESRC-funded project “After the War Ends: Violence in Post-Soviet Unrecognized States.” The overall project addresses the question, what happens after the fighting in intrastate conflicts officially ends? It hones in on post-war developments in so-called de facto, or unrecognized, states. The survey deposited here took place in Nagorno Karabakh in September 2013. Nagorno Karabakh is officially part of Azerbaijan, but it has functioned as a de facto state since the war with its “parent” state Azerbaijan in 1988-1993. The survey, which covers 1,000 respondents over the age of 18, asks people questions about their views on their present political, social, economic, and security situation, as well as their experiences of violence in the war of 1988-1993. The survey respondents were selected randomly from eight primary sampling units (the capital and the seven regions controlled by the Nagorno Karabakh authorities). Participation was entirely voluntary, and the survey responses are anonymous. The survey questions were asked in the respondents’ native tongue, by professionally trained interviewers. The survey was designed by the Dr. Bakke, based on surveys carried out elsewhere, and was commissioned to be carried out in the field by the Armenian Sociological Association.
Data creators: |
Creator Name |
Affiliation |
ORCID (as URL) |
Bakke Kristin Marie |
|
|
|
Sponsors: |
ESRC
|
Grant reference: |
ES/I035935/1
|
Topic classification: |
Politics Society and culture Psychology
|
Keywords: |
surveys, post-conflict situations, political attitudes, Nagorno Karabakh
|
Project title: |
After the war ends: Violence in Post-Soviet unrecognized states
|
Alternative title: |
Post-War attitudes in a de facto State: Nagorno Karabakh, 2013
|
Grant holders: |
Kristin Marie Bakke
|
Project dates: |
From | To |
---|
31 March 2012 | 30 September 2014 |
|
Date published: |
18 Sep 2015 12:32
|
Last modified: |
08 May 2019 10:06
|
Temporal coverage: |
From | To |
---|
1 January 1988 | 27 September 2013 |
|
Collection period: |
Date from: | Date to: |
---|
31 March 2012 | 30 September 2014 |
|
Geographical area: |
Nagorno Karabakh |
Spatial unit: |
Administrative > Regions |
Data collection method: |
The survey asks people 66 main questions (with several sub-questions) about their views on their present political, social, economic, and security situation, as well as their experiences of violence in the war of 1988-1993. The survey was designed by the PI, Dr. Bakke, based on surveys carried out elsewhere, and was commissioned to be carried out in the field by the Armenian Sociological Association, under the supervision of Dr. Gevorg Poghosyan (although Nagorno Karabakh is officially located within Azerbaijan, it is an Karabakh/Armenian-controlled de facto state; hence the use of an Armenian local partner). The survey includes 1,000 randomly selected participants over the age of 18, all anonymous. There were eight primary sampling units: the capital, Stepanakert, and the seven regions controlled by the Nagorno Karabakh authorities. The general control and sample correction were based on the results of the National Statistics (the last census was held in Nagorno Karabakh in 2012). The respondents are distributed as follows across the primary sampling units: Stepanakert (town of Stepanakert), 360 respondents; Askeran (town of Askeran), 120 respondents; Martuni (town of Martuni), 170 respondents; Martakert (town of Martakert), 140 respondents; Hadrut (town of Hadrut), 90 respondents; Shahumyan (town of Kalbajar), 20 respondents; Shushi (town of Shushi), 30 respondents; Kashatagh (town of Berdzor), 70 respondents. In each selected sampling point, the interviewers used the following route selection principle: In each city 3-20 starting points were selected (which can be schools, stations, squares, museums and other administrative objects). From the starting points, the interviewers chose the crossing streets, chose the first apartment building, and then the next third house in the case of houses and the fifth one in the case of apartment buildings. The survey questions were asked in the respondents’ native tongue, by professionally trained interviewers. In total, one supervisor, three field supervisors, seven regional supervisors, and 27 interviewers were involved. Each interviewer conducted three-five interviews daily, with the average interview lasting 30-40 minutes. The work of the interviewers was controlled with home visits during the interview (in five percent of cases), home visit after the interview (10 percent of cases), and telephone control (15 percent of cases). In total, 1,000 interviews were completed. Among them, 888 were completed during the first visit; the remaining 112, during a second visit. There were 83 refusals, 30 instances of nobody being at home, and 3 interviews that did not take place due to ill health. |
Observation unit: |
Individual |
Kind of data: |
Numeric |
Type of data: |
Other surveys |
Resource language: |
English |
|
Data sourcing, processing and preparation: |
The study went through Ethics approval at UCL and was carried out in accordance with the standards of the Armenian Sociological Association. Compliant with the UK Data Protection Act of 1998, the data collected, which is anonymous, is to be used in statistical analyses where the responses are analyzed as a group, i.e. the data is not to be analyzed based on any one individual response.
Participation in the survey was entirely voluntary. Prior to agreeing to participate, potential respondents were informed about the nature of the project, and they had the option to refrain from participating. If they chose to participate, they were assured that they could refrain from answering questions they did not want to answer—without any repercussions. They were informed that the survey is carried out for an academic project and has no affiliation with any political party or government.
Several steps have been taken to ensure anonymity. No names are recorded. Though the respondents’ age, sex, occupation, and sampling point are recorded, the use of the data in resulting publications by the PI, Dr. Bakke, and her collaborators will not enable anyone to link any one respondent to a particular reply in the survey. Given the relatively small number of respondents in some of the sampling points and the sensitive nature of some of the questions asked, in making the survey available here, Dr. Bakke has also removed from the deposited survey information about town and district (the sampling points) and questions that could otherwise be used to identify the respondents. These include questions about marital status (q2), occupation (q6) and position (q7), place of birth (q11), how long the respondent has lived in her/his current home (q12) and from where she/he moved (q13). All questions can be found in the questionnaire.
|
Rights owners: |
Name |
Affiliation |
ORCID (as URL) |
Bakke Kristin Marie |
|
|
|
Contact: |
Name | Email | Affiliation | ORCID (as URL) |
---|
Bakke, Kristin Marie | kmbakke@ucl.ac.uk | University College London | Unspecified |
|
Notes on access: |
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service. All requests are subject to the permission of the data owner or his/her nominee. Please email the contact person for this data collections to request permission to access the data, explaining your reason for wanting access to do the data. Once permission is obtained, please forward this to the ReShare administrator.
|
Publisher: |
UK Data Archive
|
Last modified: |
08 May 2019 10:06
|
|
Available Files
Data
Documentation
Read me
Edit item (login required)
 |
Edit Item |