Sefton, Martin
(2018).
Cooperation in small groups: The effect of group size.
[Data Collection]. Colchester, Essex:
UK Data Archive.
10.5255/UKDA-SN-853008
This network project brings together economists, psychologists, computer and complexity scientists from three leading centres for behavioural social science at Nottingham, Warwick and UEA. This group will lead a research programme with two broad objectives: to develop and test cross-disciplinary models of human behaviour and behaviour change; to draw out their implications for the formulation and evaluation of public policy.
Foundational research will focus on three inter-related themes:
understanding individual behaviour and behaviour change; understanding social and interactive behaviour; rethinking the foundations of policy analysis.
The project will explore implications of the basic science for policy via a series of applied projects connecting naturally with the three themes. These will include: the determinants of consumer credit behaviour; the formation of social values; strategies for evaluation of policies affecting health and safety.
The research will integrate theoretical perspectives from multiple disciplines and utilise a wide range of complementary methodologies including: theoretical modeling of individuals, groups and complex systems; conceptual analysis; lab and field experiments; analysis of large data sets.
The Network will promote high quality cross-disciplinary research and serve as a policy forum for understanding behaviour and behaviour change.
Data description (abstract)
We study the effect of group size on cooperation in voluntary contribution mechanism games. As in previous experiments, we study four- and eight-person groups in high and low marginal per capita return (MPCR) conditions. We find a positive effect of group size in the low MPCR condition, as in previous experiments. However, in the high MPCR condition we observe a negative group size effect. We extend the design to investigate two- and three-person groups in the high MPCR condition, and find that cooperation is highest of all in two-person groups. The findings in the high MPCR condition are consistent with those from n-person prisoner’s dilemma and oligopoly experiments that suggest it is more difficult to sustain cooperation in larger groups. The findings from the low MPCR condition suggest that this effect can be overridden. In particular, when cooperation is low other factors, such as considerations of the social benefits of contributing (which increase with group size), may dominate any negative group size effect
Data creators: |
Creator Name |
Affiliation |
ORCID (as URL) |
Sefton Martin |
University of Nottingham |
|
|
Contributors: |
Name |
Affiliation |
ORCID (as URL) |
Nosenzo Daniele |
University of Nottingham |
|
Quercia Simone |
University of Bonn |
|
|
Sponsors: |
Economic and Social Research Council
|
Grant reference: |
ES/K002201/1
|
Topic classification: |
Economics
|
Keywords: |
voluntary contribution mechanism, cooperation, group size
|
Project title: |
Network for Integrated Behavioural Science
|
Grant holders: |
Chris Starmer, Nick Chater, Daniel John Zizzo, Gordon Brown, Anders Poulsen, Martin Sefton, Neil Stewart, Uwe Aickelin, Robert Sugden, John Gathergood, Abigail Barr, Robin Cubitt, Robert MacKay, Shaun Hargreaves-Heap, Simon Gaechter, Graham Loomes, Enrique Fatas, Daniel Read, Theodore Turocy
|
Project dates: |
From | To |
---|
31 December 2012 | 30 September 2017 |
|
Date published: |
04 Jan 2018 12:58
|
Last modified: |
04 Jan 2018 12:58
|
Collection period: |
Date from: | Date to: |
---|
31 December 2012 | 30 September 2017 |
|
Country: |
United Kingdom |
Data collection method: |
Experiment. At the beginning of each session participants were randomly matched into groups that remained the same for the whole experiment. Participants did not know the identities of the other subjects in the room with whom they were grouped. They were given instructions for the experiment (reproduced in the Electronic Supplementary Material) and these were read aloud by the experimenter. Any questions were answered by the experimenter in private, and no communication between participants was allowed. No information passed across groups during the entire session. All groups played a ten-period VCM game. In each period, players received an endowment of 20 tokens and had to choose how many to allocate to a public account and how many to keep in a private account. A player earned α points for each token she kept in her private account, and β points from each token allocated to the public account (regardless of which group member had contributed it). At the end of the period players were informed of the decisions and earnings of each group member. |
Observation unit: |
Individual |
Kind of data: |
Numeric |
Type of data: |
Experimental data
|
Resource language: |
English |
|
Data sourcing, processing and preparation: |
The experiment was conducted at the University of Nottingham using the software z-Tree (Fischbacher 2007) and 364 student subjects from a wide range of disciplines, recruited through the online recruiting system ORSEE (Greiner 2004). Multiple sessions were conducted and no participant took part in more than one session.
|
Rights owners: |
Name |
Affiliation |
ORCID (as URL) |
Sefton Martin |
University of Nottingham |
|
|
Contact: |
Name | Email | Affiliation | ORCID (as URL) |
---|
Sefton, Martin | martin.sefton@nottingham.ac.uk | University of Nottingham | Unspecified |
|
Notes on access: |
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.
|
Publisher: |
UK Data Archive
|
Last modified: |
04 Jan 2018 12:58
|
|
Available Files
Data
Documentation
Read me
Edit item (login required)
 |
Edit Item |