Vrain, Emilie
(2026).
UK Data Concerns and AI Applications for Climate, 2024.
[Data Collection]. Colchester, Essex:
UK Data Service.
iDODDLE is a four year project running from 2021-2025. iDODDLE’s aim is to help develop a new thematic and inter-disciplinary science of digitalised daily life in support of action on climate change.
The aims of iDODDLE are:
1) To understand the ways in which digitalised daily life impacts climate change. Examples of these ways include substituting physical for digital, accessing services instead of owning goods, and integrating households into supply networks.
2) To determine the conditions under which digitalised daily life has beneficial or adverse impacts on climate change. Examples of these conditions include access to infrastructure, trust in institutions, and technophile lifestyles.
3) To develop an evidence-based programme of action for ensuring digitalised daily life helps tackle climate change. Examples of this evidence base include quantitative systems analysis of energy and material flows at national and global scales.
iDODDLE’s research activities are organised into three themes – on people (micro-level), on system conditions (macro-level), and on action (policy and practice).
Data description (abstract)
Survey data collected to examine how data privacy concerns relate to engagement with data-driven digital applications with potential benefits for climate change in everyday life, including those enabled by artificial intelligence (AI). The study was designed to explore how individuals perceive data collection practices and how these perceptions shape reported use and intended use of digital services across four domains: retail, mobility, food, and home energy.
Data were collected through an online survey of 2,078 adults aged 18 and over living in the United Kingdom. Quota sampling was used to achieve national representativeness by age and gender. The survey includes measures of application usage and frequency, perceived data collection, data privacy concerns, data protection behaviours, perceived AI risks and benefits, familiarity with AI (including generative AI), and socio-demographic characteristics.
The survey also includes an embedded vignette experiment in which respondents were randomly assigned to descriptions of digital applications that varied in the salience of AI involvement and personal data collection. This design allows examination of how explicit references to AI and data use influence stated usage intentions. The data were collected to support analysis of behavioural responses to digital and AI-enabled services, particularly in relation to privacy, trust, and user decision-making in climate-relevant application domains.
| Data creators: |
|
| Sponsors: |
European Research Council
|
| Grant reference: |
101003083
|
| Topic classification: |
Science and technology Society and culture
|
| Keywords: |
DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY, HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PERCEPTION, INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY
|
| Project title: |
iDODDLE: The Impacts of Digitalised Daily Life on Climate Change
|
| Grant holders: |
Charlie Wilson
|
| Project dates: |
| From | To |
|---|
| 1 October 2022 | 30 September 2025 |
|
| Date published: |
26 Mar 2026 11:21
|
| Last modified: |
26 Mar 2026 11:21
|
| Collection period: |
| Date from: | Date to: |
|---|
| 1 April 2024 | 30 April 2024 |
|
| Geographical area: |
UK |
| Country: |
United Kingdom |
| Spatial unit: |
No Spatial Unit |
| Data collection method: |
Data were collected through a survey instrument administered by a market research company (Qualtrics) in April 2024 to a nationally representative sample (age and sex) of adults in the UK. The UK was chosen as the reference country due to the wide availability of climate-relevant applications and the policy imperative to reduce per capita emissions in line with legally binding domestic climate targets. Participants received monetary compensation and the final sample size is 2,078. The survey instrument comprises of six blocks of questions followed by a vignette-based experimental survey block. Questions used either single or multi-item scales based on precedents in the literature (with slight modifications to fit the current research context) and newly developed items. Many questions consisted of statements with level of agreement captured by a 5-point Likert scale. The median duration of the survey was 11.9 minutes. Initial survey blocks captured demographic and contextual characteristics to inform inclusion criteria (above the age of 18) and quota fulfilment (nationally representative sample on age and gender), followed by self-reported use of a diverse set of 15 data-driven climate-relevant applications largely enabled by AI (e.g., learning algorithms, cloud-based services, or other forms of data-dependent service-provision) in four domains of daily life: retail, mobility, food and home energy. These applications are referred to as ‘climate-relevant’ to denote applications whose design and use have implications for energy demand and emissions, recognising that their ultimate climate impact depends on user behaviour, system interactions, and potential rebound effects. Logic branching allowed follow-ups regarding usage frequency to be customised according to current, past or non-use. For example, a participant who indicated current use of an application was then asked, ‘how often do you do [activity]?’. Subsequent blocks assessed usage propensity for four case study applications (one per domain), general attitudes towards technology, data privacy concerns, data protection behaviours and perceptions of and attitudes to AI. The latter was taken directly from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) survey on AI and included a measure of perceived AI risk which did not specify a particular type of risk. This block was positioned after questions on data privacy concerns and protection behaviours to provide contextual grounding in data-related issues. Several items on AI information sources were adapted from, and additional questions included, for example to assess AI familiarity e.g., usage of GenAI. To examine the potential effects of the recent surge in AI awareness following the release of ChatGPT 3.5, we also included retrospective items measuring changes in attitudes and behaviours over the previous year of 2023 (the first full year of the GenAI hype). To capture change in application usage, we asked ‘Compared to a year ago, how would you describe the frequency you do the following activities?’. Following the main survey, we implemented a vignette experiment to test how awareness of AI data practices affects perceptions of climate-relevant apps that use AI and their usage propensity. The vignettes represented stylised but plausible versions of existing or emerging applications rather than descriptions of specific commercial products. They were designed to capture perceptions of AI-related data practices across realistic, recognisable domains (e.g., smart thermostats, bike-sharing, food-waste apps) while maintaining experimental control. To ensure realism, we mapped each vignette to a representative market leader and reviewed their publicly available documentation on ownership, business model, data collection, and AI use. Each respondent was randomly assigned to one of the eight vignettes, describing the use of one of four climate-relevant applications, with either an increased or reduced emphasis on personal data being collected by AI. The vignettes respected the principles of realism, clarity, simplicity and internal consistency. |
| Observation unit: |
Individual |
| Kind of data: |
Numeric, Text |
| Type of data: |
UK survey data |
| Resource language: |
English |
|
| Data sourcing, processing and preparation: |
A total of 8920 respondents started the survey and consented and committed to taking part. 5478 respondents were disqualified with the first attention check, and 794 respondents were disqualified at the second attention check which assessed attentiveness while reading the vignette. From the soft launch (n=100), the median time for completion was 9.41 minutes. A speed checker of half this median (4.69 mins or 281 seconds) was implemented for the full launch to automatically terminate those who did not responding thoughtfully. This speed checker removed 406 respondents. Overall, 525 completes were removed by Qualtrics due to straight-lining, speeders (406), likely bots (5) or duplicate responses (79). Qualtrics delivered a file with 2123 completes from which verification and quality checks were conducted by researchers. 45 responses did not include question blocks 9-16 and were therefore removed. The remaining were determined as high quality, resulting in a final sample of n= 2078.
|
| Rights owners: |
|
| Contact: |
| Name | Email | Affiliation | ORCID (as URL) |
|---|
| Vrain, Emilie | emilie.vrain@eci.ox.ac.uk | Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford | Unspecified |
|
| Notes on access: |
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service. All requests are subject to the permission of the data owner or his/her nominee. Please email the contact person for this data collection to request permission to access the data, explaining your reason for wanting access to the data, then contact our Access Helpdesk.
|
| Publisher: |
UK Data Service
|
| Last modified: |
26 Mar 2026 11:21
|
|
Available Files
Data
Documentation
Edit item (login required)
 |
Edit Item |