Byrom, Nicola and Slack, Hannah and Long, Emily
(2026).
U-Belong Social Network Data: Egocentric Network Interviews and Survey Measures, 2023-2024.
[Data Collection]. Colchester, Essex:
UK Data Service.
10.5255/UKDA-SN-858287
Loneliness is linked to poor mental health and reduced educational achievement and social mobility. It is often thought of as something experienced by the elderly. However, loneliness is a growing concern among university students. Recent studies have found that young people report high levels of loneliness. This seems puzzling. University students are surrounded by peers. They often live with friends and have many opportunities to socialise. Why would they feel lonely?
Addressing this question, we will develop the concept of loneliness. We will work with young people to represent the adolescent experience accurately and sensitively. We will work with students across the project, making co-creation a priority.
We will identify opportunities to reduce loneliness in university students. There are 1.7million adolescents in UK universities. As many in 2 in 5 students may meet criteria for mental illness. Increasingly, this is a cause for concern. Universities are looking for ways to support student mental health. Students are at a developmental transition and experience dramatic changes in social networks, creating risk for loneliness. However, if properly understood, loneliness may be reduced, providing a target to boost mental health and educational achievement. New interventions depend on a strong theoretical framework and researchers need suitable tools to measure loneliness.
We can all describe loneliness. The COVID-19 lockdowns gave many people new insights into the experience of loneliness. However, understanding of the concept, especially in young people, is limited. Historical analysis can help. We will explore when and how the idea of university as a social experience emerged. This will provide a broader social and cultural context to understand loneliness.
We will make it easier to measure loneliness sensitively. Loneliness is often assessed using a single question: "how often do you feel lonely?" This cannot identify differences in origin or experience. It does not capture how loneliness relates to social connection, sense of belonging or expectations. We will investigate these links and develop new tools to allow differences in loneliness to be understood.
We will look at how social contacts change as young people move to university and ask if these changes cause loneliness. To do this, we will make use of the rich, but under-used, Social Network Analysis. Because this approach is under-used, we will develop simplified resources to help the others capture key insights in surveys. We will develop a new measurement tool to assess expectations of social connection. We will use this to identify differences in student's expectations for social connection and ask how these expectations impact the experience of loneliness.
Students often describe belonging as the opposite of loneliness. Do students lack a of sense of belonging? Does this drive loneliness? We will test whether a sense of belonging helps us understand loneliness, over and above social networks and expectations for social connection. We will explore how the group dynamics that support a sense of belonging, especially for minority groups, may influence loneliness.
Social identity influences our sense of belonging. Therefore, in looking at belonging, as well as social connection and expectations, the diversity of the student population is key. Across our research we aim to understand the broad diversity of student experience and how this shapes differences in the experience of loneliness.
We will develop a rich and detailed theoretical framework for loneliness. We will test whether there are different types of loneliness and examine how diverse social identities shape the experience of loneliness. The project will develop new tools to facilitate future research into loneliness. Through prioritising co-creation, we will address barriers to engagement and create resources and guidance to accelerate student involvement in research.
Data description (abstract)
This deposit comprises two related egocentric social network datasets collected as part of the UK MRC–funded U-Belong project, which examines social belonging, social connection, and mental health among students in UK higher education. Together, these datasets capture both the structure and composition of students’ personal social networks and students’ perceptions and experiences of those networks, enabling detailed cross-sectional and longitudinal network analyses.
The first component (“From Familiar Faces”) consists of structured egocentric social network interview data collected from university students at up to two time points. Participants identified individuals (“alters”) in their personal social networks and provided information on relationship type using broad, pre-specified categories (e.g. friend, family member, romantic partner, classmate, flatmate, university staff), emotional closeness, frequency and mode of contact, and perceived support. Participants also reported whether alters knew one another, allowing the construction of alter–alter ties and the derivation of network structure measures such as network size, density, interconnectedness, and composition over time.
The second component comprises complementary survey-based social network measures. These data focus on aggregate and compositional characteristics of students’ social networks, including perceived network size, diversity, availability of support, and patterns of social connection across different relational contexts. These measures are designed to be analytically compatible with the interview-based network data, enabling comparison between detailed egocentric network structures and broader self-reported network characteristics.
Across both components, the datasets include participant-level variables (with pseudonymous identifiers enabling longitudinal linkage), alter-level variables (where applicable), tie-level indicators, and derived network measures. No names or free-text descriptions of network members are included. Relationship types are restricted to broad categorical descriptors, and temporal information has been minimised to reduce disclosure risk.
| Data creators: |
|
| Sponsors: |
SPF
|
| Grant reference: |
MR/X002810/1
|
| Topic classification: |
Health Education Psychology
|
| Keywords: |
SOCIAL NETWORKS, HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS, LONELINESS, MENTAL HEALTH
|
| Project title: |
The time of their lives? Developing Concepts and Methods to Understand Loneliness in Students
|
| Grant holders: |
Nicola Byrom, Fuhrmann Delia, Arseneault Louise, Foster Juliet, Homer Sophie, Crook Sarah, Long Emily
|
| Project dates: |
| From | To |
|---|
| 1 November 2022 | 29 April 2026 |
|
| Date published: |
17 Mar 2026 14:04
|
| Last modified: |
17 Mar 2026 14:04
|
| Collection period: |
| Date from: | Date to: |
|---|
| 1 September 2023 | 30 June 2024 |
|
| Country: |
United Kingdom |
| Data collection method: |
Data were collected as part of the UK MRC–funded U-Belong project using a longitudinal, mixed-method egocentric social network design. The study focused on students transitioning into university, a period associated with elevated risk of loneliness. Data collection combined online surveys with structured social network interviews to capture complementary perspectives on students’ social connections. Participants were first recruited via university communications, student newsletters, and social media advertisements. Eligible participants were first-year or foundation-year undergraduate students aged 18 years or over and enrolled at UK universities. Ethical approval for survey data collection was granted by King’s College London, and ethical approval for social network interviews was granted by the University of Glasgow. Survey data collection Participants completed online surveys at two time points during the academic year using Qualtrics. Baseline data (Time 1) were collected early in the academic year and included demographic characteristics and measures of loneliness. Follow-up data (Time 2) were collected later in the academic year and included repeated loneliness measures alongside social network questions. Survey-based network measures were completed prior to the more detailed network modules to minimise respondent burden. Social network interview At follow-up, a subsample of participants completed a full egocentric social network interview conducted remotely via Zoom by trained interviewers, using Network Canvas software. Participants were asked to identify people in their social network using multiple name generators designed to elicit both strong and weaker ties, including people they had interacted with recently, people they felt connected to but had not recently interacted with, and people they interacted with frequently but did not know well. No upper limit was placed on the number of contacts named. For each named contact, participants provided information using pre-specified response options, including relationship type, perceived closeness, frequency and mode of contact, and whether the contact was a university student. Participants also reported whether each contact knew the other named contacts, enabling the construction of alter–alter ties and the derivation of network structure measures such as network size and density. All attributes of social contacts reflect the participant’s perceptions rather than objective characteristics, consistent with egocentric network methodology Mini-network survey Participants also completed a short-form (“mini-network”) survey embedded within the online questionnaire. This method mirrored the structure of the full interview but constrained participants to naming up to five individuals they had socialised with most frequently in the previous two weeks. For each named individual, participants answered a reduced set of questions on relationship type, perceived closeness, and whether the named individuals knew one another. This approach was designed to capture core network features while reducing respondent burden and enabling online self-administration Aggregate network measures In addition to name-based methods, participants completed a set of aggregate survey items capturing perceived characteristics of their social networks without naming specific individuals. These items asked participants to report on overall network size, perceived closeness to friends, the extent to which friends shared key characteristics with the participant (e.g. age, gender identity, student status), and the presence of difficult or negative relationships. The wording of these items was informed by consultation with a student advisory group and focused explicitly on “friends,” reflecting their centrality to students’ social experiences. Longitudinal linkage and preparation Participants were assigned pseudonymous identifiers to enable linkage of survey and network data across time points and across the three network measurement approaches. Derived social network measures (e.g. network size, homophily indices, diversity measures, density) were calculated following established methods and are documented in the accompanying codebooks. |
| Observation unit: |
Individual |
| Kind of data: |
Numeric, Text |
| Type of data: |
Cohort and longitudinal studies, Other surveys |
| Resource language: |
English |
|
| Data sourcing, processing and preparation: |
The data deposited were generated by the U-Belong research team as part of a programme of primary data collection examining social connection, belonging, and loneliness among university students in the UK. The social network datasets draw on two related strands of work within the project: structured egocentric social network interviews and complementary survey-based network measures. Raw data were sourced from multiple platforms, including online survey software and network data collection software, and subsequently integrated into a harmonised analytic dataset.
Following data collection, raw exports were transferred to secure research environments and processed using statistical software. Processing involved verification of participant identifiers, alignment of variable naming conventions across data sources, and consistency checks to ensure correct linkage between participant-level, alter-level, and tie-level records. Where data were collected at multiple time points or using multiple measurement approaches, variables were harmonised to enable comparison while retaining information on the original source and measurement context.
Derived variables were created in accordance with documented project protocols and established social network analysis methods. These include summary indicators of network size, composition, homophily, diversity, density, and stability, as well as aggregated measures of perceived relational characteristics. Where composite or derived measures were generated, the underlying construction rules, scaling decisions, and any thresholds applied are fully documented in the accompanying codebooks. Raw item-level data are retained where possible to support alternative operationalisations by secondary users.
Data preparation included systematic checks for missingness, out-of-range values, and internal inconsistencies. No statistical imputation was applied; missing data are coded explicitly and left for users to handle according to their analytic needs. In cases where alternative representations of the same network data were required (e.g. unconstrained networks versus constrained subsets of contacts), parallel derived variables were created rather than overwriting original data, ensuring transparency and reproducibility.
Anonymisation procedures were applied prior to deposit in line with UK Data Service guidance. All direct identifiers were removed. Network member names and any free-text descriptions were excluded at source. Relationship characteristics are recorded only using broad, pre-specified categories. Temporal information was generalised, and variables with high disclosure risk arising from combinatorial uniqueness were either aggregated or restructured (for example, multi-select responses decomposed into binary indicators). Participant identifiers included in the dataset are pseudonymous and cannot be used to identify individuals.
The final deposited datasets are accompanied by detailed documentation, including comprehensive codebooks describing variable definitions, data structure, derivation of network measures, and wave availability. Together, these materials support transparent secondary analysis while ensuring appropriate protection of participant confidentiality.
|
| Rights owners: |
|
| Contact: |
|
| Notes on access: |
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.
|
| Publisher: |
UK Data Service
|
| Last modified: |
17 Mar 2026 14:04
|
|
Available Files
Data
Documentation
Edit item (login required)
 |
Edit Item |