Uptake and impact of interlinked index-based insurance with credit and agricultural inputs: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia 2016-2018

Belissa, Temesgen and Lensink, Robert and Marr, Ana (2020). Uptake and impact of interlinked index-based insurance with credit and agricultural inputs: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia 2016-2018. [Data Collection]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Service. 10.5255/UKDA-SN-853429

Farm households in Africa must cope with bad conditions as to soil quality, weather and infrastructure. The variability of rainfall causes yields to vary strongly from one year to the next. With yields already low (due to poor soil condition) these variations can be life threatening. Meanwhile, inadequate infrastructure makes it difficult to help the households with access to financial services, insurance and inputs that could stabilize their access to resources, and enhance yields.
Solving a single aspect, say bringing inputs to the farm, will not be sufficient as credit is also needed. But credit can only be provided if sufficient likelihood exists that loans will be repaid. Here, insurance can help. If insurance of the loan makes it attractive enough for the lender, a package can be composed of inputs, with credit and insurance, that solves all these problems with one bundle. Yet, the households will remain exposed to some risks as insuring against all is prohibitively expensive. What is the appropriate degree of insurance in such bundles? That is the core question addressed in this research. It aims at supplying inputs to farmers on credit, with insurance, in such a way that a good balance is found between the benefits and risks to the farmers and the profits and risks to the credit provider.
We investigate the possibilities for such a balanced approach in Kenya and Ethiopia in collaboration with a large insurance provider and a farmers organisation. Together with them we collect information on the costs, benefits and risks involved in using the inputs, the alternatives open to them, and the costs and benefits involved in providing credit to finance the purchase of inputs, with and without an insurance against crop failure.
With all this information, we go and talk to the stakeholders concerned to find out how they would respond if more or less insurance would be provided. Will credit suppliers lower their prices, if repayment of loan is more likely because the crop is insured? Will households decide to take higher yielding (but more risky) crops if part of the downside risk is insured? We establish this for the parties concerned in Kenya and Ethiopia, but also in other African countries.
Having established how these stakeholders respond to changes in insurance, we can proceed to derive what the best degree of insurance might be. And this is then finally tested in a field experiment.
With this knowledge we can help other suppliers of insurance and credit, and farm organisations to establish similar packages that are adapted to the local conditions for input supply, and financial services.

Data description (abstract)

Randomized experiment in Ethiopia that assesses the relevance of bundling index-based insurance with credit and access to inputs. We compare four index-based insurance options in terms of their impact on adoption of modern technologies, consumption and productivity: (1) a standard index-based insurance product; (2) a newly developed index-based insurance product that is promoted via farmer groups and has a delayed premium option; (3) the newly developed index-based insurance product bundled with a credit option and (4) the newly developed index-based insurance product bundled with credit and an input purchasing option. We find that allowing farmers to postpone premium payment improves uptake and consumption expenditures significantly. However, in order to increase investment in modern agricultural technologies and productivity, which is highly important for long run growth in the agricultural sector, bundling insurance with credit and access to inputs is needed. Our analysis shows that only when farmers adopt a package comprised of insurance, credit and inputs, do they significantly increase their investment in modern agricultural technologies and, consequently, farm productivity improves.

Data creators:
Creator Name Affiliation ORCID (as URL)
Belissa Temesgen Haramaya University
Lensink Robert Wageningen University
Marr Ana University of Greenwich
Sponsors: Economic and Social Research Council, Department for International Development
Grant reference: ES/L012235/1
Topic classification: Natural environment
Economics
Keywords: INSURANCE, TECHNOLOGY, FARMERS
Project title: Optimal Packaging of Insurance and Credit for Smallholder Farmers in Africa
Grant holders: Ana Marr
Project dates:
FromTo
1 October 201430 September 2018
Date published: 30 Sep 2019 10:38
Last modified: 31 Jan 2020 13:25

Available Files

Data and documentation bundle

Data

Documentation

Downloads

data downloads and page views since this item was published

View more statistics

Altmetric

Edit item (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item