Rushton, Simon
(2018).
Ability to identify scene-relative object movement is not limited
by, or yoked to, ability to perceive heading.
[Data Collection]. Colchester, Essex:
UK Data Archive.
10.5255/UKDA-SN-853037
A long-standing question is how the brain transforms the light patterns impinging onto the retina into a meaningful world of objects and animates with which the observer can interact. While enormous progress has been made in the understanding of brain functions during the last few decades, the fundamental principles underlying the processing and extraction of visual information remain elusive. This project builds on the observation that perception has been traditionally studied in a passive manner, paying relatively little attention to the observer's motor activity during the acquisition of visual information. Yet, like other species, humans are not passively exposed to the incoming flow of sensory data. Instead, they actively seek useful information by coordinating sensory processing with motor activity. Our motivating hypothesis is that self-movement is a critical component of visual perception. Considered as a problem of simple visual geometry this hypothesis might appear counter-intuitive. Considered as an image-processing problem it might appear counter-intuitive. Considered against decades of work concerned with how the brain "compensates" for self-movement it might also appear counter-intuitive. However, this hypothesis is fully plausible from a biological perspective, because more information about the scene is available when the observer moves. This was pointed out many years ago by ecological psychologists and has more recently been recognised in computer vision - where it has caused a paradigm change. We argue that the visual, motor, and proprioceptive information generated by self-movement is fundamental to visual processing
The project brings together three laboratories from The Netherlands (Dr. Brenner at VU University in Amsterdam), the US (Dr. Rucci at Boston University), and the UK (Dr Rushton at Cardiff University), which have developed critical expertise on the analyses of different types of motor activities in humans. We will systematically investigate the mechanisms by which human observers use motor, proprioceptive and global optic flow signals to accomplish visual tasks. Elucidating the perceptual impact of motor activity is critical to advancing our knowledge of how the visual system functions. Such knowledge can also potentially guide the design of objects and environments, inform the building of machines capable of replicating human visual functions, and it may provide a scientific basis for the development of treatments of visual impairments commonly associated with abnormal motor activity in pathological conditions.
Data description (abstract)
During locomotion humans can judge where they are heading relative to the scene and the movement of objects within the scene. Both judgements rely on identifying global components of optic flow. What is the relationship between the perception of heading, and the identification of object movement during self-movement? Do they rely on a shared mechanism? One way to address these questions is to compare performance on the two tasks. We designed stimuli that allowed direct comparison of the precision of heading and object movement judgements. Across a series of experiments, we found the precision was typically higher when judging scene-relative object movement than when judging heading. We also found that manipulations of the content of the visual scene can change the relative precision of the two judgements. These results demonstrate that the ability to judge scene-relative object movement during self-movement is not limited by, or yoked to, the ability to judge the direction of self-movement.
The archived data is described in Simon K. Rushton, Rongrong Chen & Li Li (2018). Ability to identify scene-relative object movement is not limited by, or yoked to, ability to perceive heading Journal of Vision, volume 18, issue 6 (see Related Resources).
Data creators: |
|
Contributors: |
Name |
Affiliation |
ORCID (as URL) |
Chen Rongrong |
University of Hong Kong |
|
|
Sponsors: |
Economic and Social Research Council, Serena Yang travel grant from the Psychology Department at The University of Hong Kong, Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (HKU 746013H), Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (17ZR1420100), NYU-ECNU Joint Research Institute
|
Grant reference: |
ES/M00001X/1
|
Topic classification: |
Psychology
|
Keywords: |
Optic flow, Heading, Flow parsing, Human, Psychophysics, motion perception
|
Project title: |
Moving to see: the benefits of self---motion for visual perception
|
Grant holders: |
Simon Rushton, Li Li
|
Project dates: |
From | To |
---|
1 August 2014 | 31 October 2017 |
|
Date published: |
02 Jul 2018 10:49
|
Last modified: |
02 Jul 2018 10:49
|
Collection period: |
Date from: | Date to: |
---|
1 August 2014 | 31 October 2017 |
|
Geographical area: |
University of Hong Kong |
Country: |
Hong Kong |
Data collection method: |
The methodology was psychophysics (method of constant stimuli). Participants made 2 alternative forced choice (2AFC) judgements after watching a briefly presented stimulus. The sample of participants consisted of undergraduate (18-21 yrs) and postgraduate (22-26 yrs) students and staff, predominantly female, from the School of Psychology, University of Hong Kong. All were unaware of the experimental hypotheses, unless otherwise indicated in the accompanying paper (see related resources for link). The participants were recruited by opportunity sampling. |
Observation unit: |
Individual |
Kind of data: |
Numeric |
Type of data: |
Experimental data
|
Resource language: |
English |
|
Rights owners: |
|
Contact: |
|
Notes on access: |
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.
|
Publisher: |
UK Data Archive
|
Last modified: |
02 Jul 2018 10:49
|
|
Available Files
Data
Documentation
Read me
Edit item (login required)
 |
Edit Item |