Bidaud, Cecile and Jones, Julia P.G. and Schreckenberg, Kate and Rabeharison, Manolotsoa
(2019).
Household survey investigating the social impact of biodiversity offset: a case study from Madagascar 2014-2015.
[Data Collection]. Colchester, Essex:
UK Data Archive.
10.5255/UKDA-SN-852341
Biodiversity offsets can be defined as fulfilling three criteria: “(1) they provide additional substitution or replacement for unavoidable negative impacts of human activity on biodiversity, (2) they involve measurable, comparable biodiversity losses and gains, and (3) they demonstrably achieve, as a minimum, no net loss of biodiversity.” (Bull, Suttle, Gordon, Singh, & Milner-Gulland, 2013, p371). In developing countries, mining companies are implementing biodiversity offset projects to compensate the degradation caused by the extraction of minerals. Mining companies can represent an important national financial windfall and offsets are seen as counteracting any associated environmental loss. However, the implementation of such schemes faces critical challenges which need investigation. For instance, how to integrate the socioeconomic targets as a proxy for poverty alleviation into biodiversity offsets is still poorly explored and not yet properly considered by mining companies (Seagle, 2012).
In this project, we analysed biodiversity offset mechanisms and their consideration of local livelihoods through one case study: Ambatovy a mining company operating in Madagascar. The main aim of the research is to determine the potential impacts of biodiversity offsets on local livelihoods through changes in the supply of locally important ecosystem services and how the outcomes for poverty alleviation can be improved.
Data description (abstract)
This dataset is part of the Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) programme, in particular the P4GES project: Can Paying for Global Ecosystem Services reduce poverty?
The database is the result of a household survey investigating the magnitude and distribution of biodiversity offset project impacts on local livelihood.
170 households in 3 different sites around biodiversity offset project in Madagascar have been surveyed.
The survey includes elements on demography, income activities and assets, change of income activities and assets within five years, as well as questions about development aid (donation and training) received by the household, involvement in local association and impacts from the offset project.
Data creators: |
Creator Name |
Affiliation |
ORCID (as URL) |
Bidaud Cecile |
Bangor University |
|
Jones Julia P.G. |
Bangor University |
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-3335
|
Schreckenberg Kate |
Southampton University |
|
Rabeharison Manolotsoa |
Antananarivo University |
|
|
Contributors: |
Name |
Affiliation |
ORCID (as URL) |
Rabeharison Manolotsoa |
Antananarivo University |
|
Ramieravola Cedric |
|
|
|
Sponsors: |
Economic and Social Research Council, Department for International Development, Natural Environment Research Council, Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation
|
Grant reference: |
FELL-2014-102
|
Topic classification: |
Natural environment
|
Keywords: |
biodiversity, natural resources
|
Project title: |
Biodiversity offsets: incorporating considerations of ecosystem services and impacts of poverty
|
Alternative title: |
ESPA
|
Grant holders: |
Cecile Bidaud, Julia Jones, Kate Schreckenberg, Patrick Ranjatson, Manoa Rabeharison
|
Project dates: |
From | To |
---|
1 June 2014 | 29 July 2016 |
|
Date published: |
03 Jun 2016 11:37
|
Last modified: |
11 Sep 2019 15:55
|
Temporal coverage: |
From | To |
---|
1 October 2014 | 30 November 2015 |
|
Collection period: |
Date from: | Date to: |
---|
2 March 2015 | 30 July 2015 |
|
Geographical area: |
Communes Maroseranana, Ambohibary and Morarano Gara |
Country: |
Madagascar |
Spatial unit: |
No Spatial Unit |
Data collection method: |
We worked with the president of the fokontany and other key informants to construct a sampling frame of all households in each site. At each site we then randomly selected 30 households in the main village of the fokontany and 30 from the scattered hamlets and isolated households on the forest edge to explore how impacts are affected by access. In Ambohibary and Maroseranana no household list was available for households outside of the main village so we surveyed all the households we were able to find (n=27 and 24 respectively). |
Observation unit: |
Household |
Kind of data: |
Numeric |
Type of data: |
Other surveys |
Resource language: |
English, Malagasy |
|
Data sourcing, processing and preparation: |
Qualitative data during first fieldwork (interviews, focus group)
Quantitative data during second fieldwork : Household survey
Data entry into database, anonymisation and archive
see complementary documentation for first and second fieldworks data collection
|
Rights owners: |
|
Contact: |
Name | Email | Affiliation | ORCID (as URL) |
---|
Bidaud, Cecile | cecile.bidaud@gmail.com | Bangor University | Unspecified | Jones, Julia P.G. | julia.jones@bangor.ac.uk | Bangor University | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-3335 |
|
Notes on access: |
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service. All requests are subject to the permission of the data owner or his/her nominee. Please email the contact person for this data collection to request permission to access the data, explaining your reason for wanting access to the data, then contact our Access Helpdesk.
|
Publisher: |
UK Data Archive
|
Last modified: |
11 Sep 2019 15:55
|
|
Available Files
Data
Documentation
Read me
Edit item (login required)
 |
Edit Item |