Bowling, Natalie and Botan, Vanessa and Santiesteban, Idalmis and Ward, Jamie and Banissy, Michael
(2019).
Atypical bodily self-awareness in vicarious pain responders 2016-2017.
[Data Collection]. Colchester, Essex:
UK Data Service.
10.5255/UKDA-SN-853496
People with mirror-touch or mirror-pain synaesthesia literally feel a sensation of touch or pain on their own body when watching somebody else being touched or in pain. While unconscious vicarious perception occurs in most healthy adults (observed as neural and bodily responses to others' experiences), these types of synaesthesia represent an extreme case of conscious vicarious perception. Mirror-touch and mirror-pain synaesthesia have previously been linked with heightened empathy and social perception abilities, and therefore provide a unique opportunity for insight into the mechanisms underlying social processes in everyone, and provide implications for interventions where there may be impairments in this domain.
These individual differences in vicarious perception raise a further question: if we represent the experiences of other people (through changes in brain activity, heart rate, emotion, etc.) as well as our own, then how do we maintain a coherent sense of self? Work conducted during my PhD addressed this problem, with a focus on processes related to awareness of one's own body. This work revealed significantly increased depersonalisation (the sense of detachment from the bodily self) and interoception (awareness of one's own internal bodily states) in mirror-pain synaesthetes compared with controls. The findings have important implications for the role of bodily self-awareness in social interaction in typical adults. For instance, since mirror-touch and mirror-pain synaesthesia are associated with heightened empathy, atypical bodily self-awareness in these individuals implicates embodied processes underlying empathetic understanding in all of us.
Data description (abstract)
Little work has assessed whether trait differences in bodily self-awareness are associated with conscious vicarious pain. Here we addressed this gap by examining individual difference factors related to awareness of the body, in conscious vicarious pain responders.
Vicarious perception refers to the ability to co-represent the experiences of others. Prior research has shown considerable inter-individual variability in vicarious perception of pain, with some experiencing conscious sensations of pain on their own body when viewing another person in pain (conscious vicarious perception / mirror-pain synaesthesia). Self-Other Theory proposes that this conscious vicarious perception may result from impairments in self-other distinction and maintaining a coherent sense of bodily self. In support of this, individuals who experience conscious vicarious perception are more susceptible to illusions of body ownership and agency.
Data creators: |
Creator Name |
Affiliation |
ORCID (as URL) |
Bowling Natalie |
University of Sussex |
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5784-3664
|
Botan Vanessa |
University of Sussex |
|
Santiesteban Idalmis |
University of Cambridge |
|
Ward Jamie |
University of Sussex |
|
Banissy Michael |
Goldsmiths, University of London |
|
|
Sponsors: |
Economic and Social Research Council
|
Grant reference: |
ES/S011811/1
|
Topic classification: |
Psychology
|
Keywords: |
anxiety, pain
|
Project title: |
Awareness of the bodily self in vicarious perception
|
Grant holders: |
Natalie Bowling
|
Project dates: |
From | To |
---|
1 October 2018 | 30 September 2019 |
|
Date published: |
17 Apr 2019 13:14
|
Last modified: |
17 Apr 2019 13:14
|
Collection period: |
Date from: | Date to: |
---|
1 October 2016 | 30 September 2017 |
|
Country: |
United Kingdom |
Data collection method: |
Data was collected across three recruitment phases. In one phase participants completed all self-report scales in one online questionnaire (n = 102). In a second phase participants first completed the VPQ, CDS, MAIA and TAS-20 in one questionnaire (n = 186), and 14 of these participants also completed the STAI-T in a later session. In a third phase participants who had previously completed the VPQ were recruited to complete the CDS (n = 320). In total 608 participants took part in the experiment. Normal or corrected-to-normal vision was required to participate. Please refer to documentation attached and the associated publication (in Related Resources) for further detail on methodology. |
Observation unit: |
Individual |
Kind of data: |
Numeric |
Type of data: |
Experimental data
, Other surveys |
Resource language: |
English |
|
Data sourcing, processing and preparation: |
Data was collected online using Qualtrics survey software and immediately anonymised.
|
Rights owners: |
|
Contact: |
|
Notes on access: |
The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.
|
Publisher: |
UK Data Service
|
Last modified: |
17 Apr 2019 13:14
|
|
Available Files
Data
Documentation
Edit item (login required)
 |
Edit Item |