# DataByPair

LeftPlayerFeedback1:
Chose the disc that gave the higher amount if the difference between the two discs were large. If they were similar, i.e. only £1 difference, chose the lower amount. Also chose some discs that were closer to my base if the amounts were even.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
If there was a large difference between the discs I chose the highest, if they were the same I chose the one closest to me, and if there was a small difference I chose the lowest.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
When the discs had a huge difference in value (£10-£1) i went for the £10 option! The £3 and £8 options i chose one £3 and one £8. The £5 both discs i chose randomly as i couldn't be sure what the other would choose. I didn't decide on discs due to m

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I thought about which the other is likely to choose and came to the conclusion that they would most likely pick the lower valued coin. 
I wanted to be red as I feel this colour represented my actions better.


RightPlayerFeedback1:
It was hard to make the decisions here as you had no idea whether the person you were matched with was thinking selfishly or kindly. It was even more difficult when the amounts were equal as you had to guess which was the least likely to have been ch

RightPlayerFeedback2:
osen by the other person. I ended up just clicking randomly.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
Quite hard to choose since you don't see the decision of the person you are matched with immediately after each scenario to at least give you an insight of what the person might be thinking of doing next .

RightPlayerFeedback1:
clicked everything on the top / has the highest amount of money


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
It is interesting that the position of the white chips can be used to influence the (indifferent) choices of the players. However, it is unlikely that a difference in value, say £6 and £5 would be influenced by the position of the white chip on the t

LeftPlayerFeedback2:
able. Would love to understand the intuition behind this.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I chose the higher one everytime because I realised it was a random experiment so I thought I would just gamble on recieving a higher amount.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
When the difference between the numbers was quite big then I would click the higher one but when it was smaller then I would click the smaller number because I wouldn't mind getting less then the other person.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I choose which discs to claim , due to there proximaty to my base and  that the other person whould tend to go for the disc with the higher money value, a higher perecntgae of the time than a low money value.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
The discs location relative to my base was a strong factor in my decision making.  I also tried to think which the other person would not chose, especially in scenarios where the discs were of equal value or of extreme value.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
The highest amount shown or if the amounts were equal then the closer disc


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
It was hard to choose becasue if we chose the same we would get nothing, and I would normally be the one to take the lesser amount, however, I thought there would be a high possibility that others may as well. so i chose the higher ammounts.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I opted for discs with larger payment at times, however, on a few occasions chose those with a slighlty lower payment in the hope that the person I was matched against would choose one with lower payments.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I didnt use any eact rules or decions I just decided which ones by which one I felt was the right one to pick!

RightPlayerFeedback1:
To gain the most amount of money
To try and guess what the other person will pick


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
Simple to follow and clear instructions. Performing the task was vcery easy in its point and click nature. Session started a little late but this was not really an issue as the experiment took a very short ammount of time to complete. Signs to find t

LeftPlayerFeedback2:
he experimentation room on entering the building could have been larger/clearer/easier to find.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I chose the discs mainly based on whether they held the higher value, discs with a smaller difference or with the exact same value, I chose randomly..


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
Chose discs at random, and felt that I had no particular system by which I selected them.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
what one was nearest the blue box, or expectations on what the other person would pick


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I generally chose the most beneficial discs however I was drawn to choosing discs that were closer to me than my opponent.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I decided to follow a pattern where I would choose the higher amount in one scenario and the lower amount in the next scenario, and where the amount was equal, I had decided to choose the circle nearest to mine in hope that my partner would choose th

RightPlayerFeedback2:
e one nearest to them, therefore avoiding a clash.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I chose the most expensive everytime hopeing they would not. No real logic in it. If they were even amounts then i wopuld chose the option that was lowest on the screen.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I was going to always pick the smaller amount because I assumed the other person was always going to pick the larger amount. But then the difference was so big (like £1 and £10) and it seemed unfair for me to be a pushover, so sometimes I chose that.

RightPlayerFeedback2:
When it was equal, I didn't know what to do and picked the one that was closest to me. I have no idea which is the real one.


RightPlayerFeedback1:
I didn't really concentrate on the amounts of money, just the positioning of the disks. Therefore, if one was closest to my square, that is what i chose. Similarly, if one was below my square, i also chose that. This is more hard to explain but i fel

RightPlayerFeedback2:
t that corresponded with my square more than one above.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I decided that most people would choose a continuous strategy and select either the highest or lowest amount every time. I hedged my bets on the other person assuming that their match would always pick the highest and therefore pick the lowest each t

LeftPlayerFeedback2:
ime...perhaps optimisitic! when there were two numbers the same i went for the one which required the furthest mouse movement, assuming the other person woud click the easiest one.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
In the scenarios I chose the discs closest to me as I though my partner may do the same in their random round. I also chose a mixture of high and low values to make it fair and possibly give myself a chance of winning even a small amount of money bec

RightPlayerFeedback2:
ause I thought my partner/people in general tend to pick the largest amounts.


RightPlayerFeedback1:
I chose to go for the highest option everytime and hoped that the other participant decided to think that going for the other option would gain them some money - even if it was a minimal amount.

It was a ricky strategy, but the end profit potentia


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
For some of the more equal disc amounts, I chose the disc nearest to my own base in the hope that my partner would do the same.

For the ones with bigger differences, I tended to choose the larger amount because I would rather be risk and get £10 t

RightPlayerFeedback1:
If they were near to me, I usually chose that. If the numbers were 1 and 10, the difference between 10 and earning nothing is large so I chose 10. between 3 and 8, I let the other go for 8, however when 8 was next to me, I chose that.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I chose a lower number then a higher number alternately, and either chose the dics below or nearest to my base.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I chose lower payoff in 2 senarios. The rest choices are with either higher or equal payoff. Half gambling, I guess.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
The instructions given about the experiment were very good. I understand everything that was told prior to the starting of the experiment.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I tried to use an aggressive stradegy in hopes that whoever I was matched up against would try and work with me and assume that that was what I would do everytime. If they were the same though and arranged vertically i chose the bottom because it is

RightPlayerFeedback2:
less visually pleasing so thought my opponent would naturally choose the top.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
Long explanation but easy to understand.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
It is quite interesting seeing the position of the disc in the square may affect our choice


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I would tend to pick the disc closest to me if they were of the same monetary value. Any that had a big difference between I went for the disc of higher value, as i knew the other person would too so there was no chance of me winning the big amount a

LeftPlayerFeedback2:
nyway. For those where the difference was not very big I would pick the disc of the smaller value due to the high probability the other person would pick the higher value.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
in many cases I have chosen the disc nearest to my base; where no differences in distance then I've chosen the highest vaue disc.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I wanted to go for the maximum sum available; however I also used the tactic of choosing the discs closest to me with the idea that my partner would do the same.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I usually chose which boxes were closest to me hoping the other person would go for the prize closest to him/her, however it also helped that these boxes were usually of higher value.

In the case where both boxes were equal distances, I chose the

LeftPlayerFeedback2:
top box

In other options I chose the highest value

RightPlayerFeedback1:
proximity to my base was a major determining factor, if they were equal distance I tried to use a simplified level k reasoning to predict the other person's choice and choose a different chip, in the case of the 10 and 1 pound chips i chose the 10 be

RightPlayerFeedback2:
cause i would rather have the chance to get 10 pounds and risk losing the 1 than forgo the opportunity cost of not trying to get the 10 pounds.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I choose which disks to claim through my instincts. I also choose the disks that where closer to my box.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
In chose the discs based on the amount the discs displayed, I picked the ten pound disc everytime as I would rather have a chance of winning ten pounds than the 1 pound displayed on the other disc.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I chose each of the disks closest to my square or in the cases in which they were equidistant i chose the higher amount as i think the other person will have gone for the lower amount.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I think it is interesting, and fair. Because all of this are random.


RightPlayerFeedback1:
I have no idea which disc the other person would choose but I try to alter my choice of the disc with a higher amount in the beginning then lower amount twice than choose the higher amount disc.  This goes on in the remaining rounds.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I chose mostly the lower numbers and the discs that were on the red side as they seemed like they were my side and the other side was the blue side, trying not to choose the same disc

RightPlayerFeedback1:
sometimes the higer value one, sometimes the closer to my square one


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I chose the discs based on several things. When the choice was between numbers that were quite far apart, I chose the higher, for example, when choosing between £1 and £10 I chose the £10 disc - I know this makes my chances slimmer as the other perso

LeftPlayerFeedback2:
n is likely to do the same, however losing the chance for £1 doesn't make much difference to me, but gaining £10 potentially does. When it was a choice between numbers that were closer together however, for example between £5 and £6, I varied my choi

LeftPlayerFeedback3:
ce. The difference of the £1 doesn't make much difference to me, and I thought that other people may always be going for the higher number - if that is the case, then at least this gives me some chance of earning something. When it was a choice betwe

LeftPlayerFeedback4:
en two numbers that were the same, i.e. £5 and £5, I think I just chose the one closest to my colour, feeling that others would likely do the same.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
it was hard trying to second guess whether people would be greedy or go for the lower value in order to get at least some money, this is why i went high on a few of them as i thought the other person may go low.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I chose a mixture of the higher amounts discs and lower amount discs to have more chance of agreeing with the other person. However when it came to a decision between 1 and 10 i always chose 10 as it was alot greater than 1.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
no one will choose 1 pound as it is low in value but both of them should have an agreement if just one of them choose 1 pound

everyone will choose 10 pounds but both of them should get nothing


RightPlayerFeedback1:
I have choosen the disc which is closer to my base. When both disc are equallly close to my base, I have choose the one with hidher value.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I generally chose whichever was less because I think that a lot of people would generally choose the greater amount, in which case we would both earn money. I would rather get something than nothing.


RightPlayerFeedback1:
Assumed others would select higher amount, so better to get something than nothing.

when same amount chose that nearest to base


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
Always took the maximum and the most benifit amount. Chose fromboth end by randomly if the amounts are morelessly equal.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
For most I just picked randomly. In some of the scenarios I picked the disc nearest to my base, and in some, where there was a large difference in the value of the discs, I picked the highest value.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
Bit of a guess, attempting to guess what the other would pick

RightPlayerFeedback1:
Randomly, and the position closest to the blue disk(my disk)


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I will consider the other person maybe assumption that he or she will choose the lower payment because he or she considers I want the higher payment. If the payments were equal, I chose the one which was far away my position.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
chose the disk nearest to my base, and decided randomly on the disks which were in the middle


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I tried to think what the other person would choose - and then I chose the opposite.  It's hard to decide what the other person would do sometimes

RightPlayerFeedback1:
Blues on top or the closest to my base was the one I chose


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I hoped the other person would expect me to choose the higher one and would choose the lower ones. I did not do this with all claims though. When the amount was the same, I chose the one that was least likely to be chosen by me.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I  tend to choose the disc that is closer to my position, I am more interested in the disc with higher amount of money but I sometimes choose the disc with lower amount of money just incase my paired person chooses the same disc.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
As a first thought I claimed the dics closest to me, however this varied depending on the cash amounts available. I used a combination of random choices or if in a scenario where the payoffs were considerably different, I chose the higher payoff (exc

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I did chose the disc with the smaller amount because i thought the other person would want the bigger amount because that is how the human mind operates.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I chose the disc base on the position and what other would choose (which I guess). Mostly those discs are nearer to me, or which with smaller amount. Have one of those small amount discs could be better than nothing.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
Randomly alternated between high and low.


RightPlayerFeedback1:
i made my choice base on the fact that the other person would definately pick higher


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I chose the disc based on the colour assigned to me and based on the amount of money on it. In some cases, I chose the lower value knowing full well that my opponent is more likely to choose a higher value. This is done to probably  increase our chan

LeftPlayerFeedback2:
ces of more money as well as the real case.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
Last time I did something like this at an experiment, I chose the option that would benefit both people and it didn't work as I got paired with someone  who took everything, so this time I chose the option that benefits me.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I just choose them randomly and think others choics.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
In most situations, I choose the smaller value disc.
When both discs have same value or just 1£ different, I tend to choose the one on the bottom right because I'm on the right and choosing bottom is my habit


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
if the differnce between two disc is huge enough, if will go higher worth disc and similarly if the difference between two disc is not large enough i will choose lower worth disc.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
when i chose the disc, i hope get more money, also, i was guessed  other's chose through the thingking of other's mind. if i want to get the disc with agreement,i could chose less money disc. however, i was chose disc of more money,  it is a gamble f


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
if the lower on is really low and very different from the higher one, i choose the higher one. if the two is similar i choose the one near me or at the top.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
Comapred the values on the two discs. If the values are not significantly differenct I chose the lower value disc hoping that the other person would choose the higher value disc. But if the discs are significantly different like £10 and £1, I chose t

RightPlayerFeedback2:
he £10 disc becasue the chance of getting £10 is of significantly greater value than loosing £1.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
It is not easy to make any decisions regards with choosing money. Obviously, many people will aim to gain more profits by chosing higher value coin. However, sometimes I am afraid that the other person might choose the same coin. So, the 2nd appear o

LeftPlayerFeedback2:
f £10 is also chanllenging, I took a risk of choosing higher value coin, rather than £1 on my decision. 

For distance wise, selecting a coin where is located at the same position with the following scenario also makes me feel to choose that coin e

RightPlayerFeedback1:
1. choose the cloest one which near to me if the the price of disc is the same.
2. chang the choosing method, like, the lower or higher  price of disc in different scenariors


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
If the value is about the same, I chose the smaller because probably the other person will choose the bigger. For big differences I chose the bigger, even though the other person probably will choose the same, we both don't get anything but the small

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I decided to take the highest disk each time because people may take the lower disc because they think the other person will take the higher disk. Plus it's not necessarily worth it if its £1. When the two sums were equal I chose the one closest to m


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
If possible, I always selected the highest valued disc. This was in the hope that the other person would believe that i would do so and select a lower disc to avoid earning nothing.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I assume that the person on the other end will take the higher value. So when the difference betrween the two is not that great i took the smaller one. For the £10 and £1 scenario, i picked ten and hope it's not the real scenario. Or for a partner wh

RightPlayerFeedback2:
o choose the one pound. The last two, I picked the one down, and then the one closest to my base.


LeftPlayerFeedback1:
I based my desicion on what i thought the other person would make, if the amounts were similar. So i would pick 5 if the choice was between 5 and 6.

RightPlayerFeedback1:
I tried to alternate the earnings for each of the scenarios. In the first, other gets highest, then I get the highest in the next and so on.


